Case 65: Knee Pain

Colleen Sweeney, Akash Desai

A 55-year-old female with no pertinent past medical or surgical history was brought in by ambulance after a bicycle accident with left knee pain.  She was unhelmeted while riding a bicycle going 10mph when she collided into an e-bike. Her left knee was caught in her handlebars; she denied head trauma and had no LOC.  

Vitals: BP 168/120, HR 70, T 96.0F, RR 22, SpO2 95% on RA, BMI 24.41 

Physical Exam: 
General/Neuro: alert, in acute distress, diaphoretic 
HEENT: normocephalic, atraumatic, EOMI 
CV: normal rate 
Resp: tachypneic 
Abdomen: flat, soft, no tenderness 
MSK: RLE normal 
L knee: +swelling, +deformity. Skin intact, small ecchymosis to left lateral knee. Knee diffusely tender to palpation. Sensation intact to light touch throughout. Palpable popliteal, PT, and DP pulses. Able to wiggle toes. Compartments compressible. Patient unable to tolerate any movement of L knee secondary to pain. 
L lower leg: +swelling from knee distally, no lacerations 
L ankle/foot: normal pulse, sensation intact to light touch throughout 

Radiographs were indicated and initially attempted at bedside, however were unsuccessful as the patient was unable to tolerate the pain. Radiography was delayed until two hours due to pain management and census.  In the interim, a POCUS was performed

Figure 1. Transverse view of infrapatellar lipohemarthrosis. 
Figure 2. Longitudinal view of infrapatellar lipohemarthrosis.  
Figure 3. Longitudinal view of tibia with cortical break (arrow). 

Xray findings: "Acute, comminuted, displaced proximal tibial fracture extending to the lateral and central tibial plateau.  Acute, mildly displaced and impacted fibular neck fracture.  No fracture or malalignment of the left ankle. "

The patient was admitted to the trauma surgery service. The next day, she underwent a left knee spanning external fixator for stabilization of the tibial plateau fracture. One week later, she had an ORIF for long-term fixation of the fracture as well as a hamstring tendon repair. 

Discussion

POCUS is increasingly utilized in acute musculoskeletal trauma. The patient’s gross knee deformity after a traumatic event led to POCUS utilization to provide rapid clinical guidance.  In this patient, ultrasound was complete half an hour prior to the first attempt at radiographs and over 2 hours prior to their completion, thus proving useful in differentiating the severity of a patient’s injury during prolonged wait times and facilitating early orthopedic surgery consultation. 

Ultrasound, though not a primary diagnostic modality for acute fractures, offers sensitivity of 87% and specificity of 70% for proximal tibial fractures specifically in cadaveric models [3]. In Figure 3, the cortical break visible on the left side of the image corresponds to the proximal tibial fracture seen on X-ray. 

Figures 1 and 2 both demonstrate lipohemarthrosis. The presence of hemarthrosis, rather than a simple joint effusion, raises the suspicion for an intra-articular injury or fracture, with ultrasound demonstrating a sensitivity of 90% and specificity of 86% for this finding [2]. When lipohemarthrosis is identified—most clearly visualized in Figure 2 as hypoechoic fat “bubbles” originating from the bone marrow—it is even more indicative of an intra-articular fracture, carrying 97% sensitivity and 100% specificity for such fractures [4]. In its early stage, lipohemarthrosis appears as scattered fat globules, which later settle into the characteristic triple-layer pattern of fat, serum, and blood products [5]. Recognition of hemarthrosis or lipohemarthrosis on ultrasound may help risk-stratify patients for joint aspiration, potentially reducing unnecessary aspirations and associated infection risk. 

The presence of lipohemarthrosis is highly suggestive of a distal femur or proximal tibial fracture. Recognizing these findings early allows clinicians to maintain a high index of suspicion for periarticular fracture prior to radiographic confirmation, enabling prompt immobilization, consultation, and fracture management. This early identification facilitates more efficient triage and throughput in the ED and underscores POCUS as a worthwhile adjunct in knee trauma in addition to traditional imaging such as X-ray, CT, and MRI [6].  

References:  

  1. Stannard JP, Lopez R, Volgas D. Soft tissue injury of the knee after tibial plateau fractures. J Knee Surg. 2010;23(4):187-192. doi:10.1055/s-0030-1268694 
  2. Taljanovic MS, Chang EY, Ha AS, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria® acute trauma to the knee. Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2020;17(5). doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2020.01.041  
  3. Demers G, Migliore S, Bennett DR, et al. Ultrasound evaluation of cranial and long bone fractures in a cadaver model. Mil Med. 2012;177(7):836-839. doi:10.7205/milmed-d-11-00407 
  4. Bonnefoy, O., Diris, B., Moinard, M. et al. Acute knee trauma: role of ultrasound. Eur Radiol 16, 2542–2548 (2006). Doi:10.1007/s00330-006-0319-x 
  5. Levrini G, Reggiani G, Vacondio R, Zompatori M, Nicoli F. Post-traumatic knee lipohemarthrosis: Temporal evolution with progressive separation of the three layers of the joint effusion by ultrasonography and computed tomography. European Journal of Radiology Extra. 2006;60(1):37-41. doi:10.1016/j.ejrex.2006.06.011  
  6. De Maeseneer M, Marcelis S, Boulet C, et al. Ultrasound of the knee with emphasis on the detailed anatomy of anterior, medial, and lateral structures. Skeletal Radiol. 2014;43(8):1025-1039. doi:10.1007/s00256-014-1841-6 

            Case 34: Rare Cause of Knee Pain

             

            A 58-year-old female presented with a chief complaint of focal lateral knee pain and swelling. She had a remote history of anterior cruciate ligament repair, as well as medial collateral ligament injury and meniscal injuries. The patient stated that she had a history of recurrent intermittent effusions. However, that day she noted focal swelling. She reported playing tennis a few days before and noted a pain in her knee with pivoting. No knee instability. No fever.

             

            Vitals: BP 118/60 | Pulse 52 | Temp 97.8 °F (36.6 °C) | Resp 12

             

            On physical examination of the knee, there was a 2 cm x 3 cm firm, immobile round mass at the inferior lateral aspect of the left knee with associated pain, mild warmth, and swelling. Decreased flexion of the joint was observed, with some pain beyond 100 degrees of flexion.

             

             

            A bedside ultrasound was performed. What do you see?

            Figure 1: Ultrasound of the lateral aspect of the knee joint

            Figure 1: Ultrasound of the lateral aspect of the knee joint

            Figure 2: Knee Effusion

            Figure 2: Knee Effusion

            Figure 3: Joint effusion and meniscal cysts

            Figure 3: Joint effusion and meniscal cysts

            Figure 4: Joint effusion

            Figure 4: Joint effusion

            Figure 5: MRI of anterior cyst forming on the meniscus

            Figure 5: MRI of anterior cyst forming on the meniscus

            Discussion

            In these images, we see classic findings of a parameniscal cyst. There is a joint effusion seen superior with Hoffa’s fat pad evident. In the lateral knee, we see extrusion of the meniscus on ultrasound, along with several small fluid collections within the meniscus (meniscal cysts). Beyond the margin of the meniscus, we see the larger parameniscal cyst situated more superficially and featuring a thick wall. Corresponding MRI images from a few months prior also show the anterior cyst forming on the meniscus. Meniscal cysts are found in 1% of MRIs obtained for knee pain [1]. They are a rare pathology most often associated with a synovial leak of fluid through degeneration of the meniscus, secondary to tears of the meniscus. Physical exam findings associated with meniscal cysts include localized pain, with a firm fluid collection at the joint line, anterior or posterior, often accompanied by a joint effusion. However, only 20% of cysts are palpable on examination with the average size being 1-2 cm [2]. Patients will present with local pain, but may also present with peroneal nerve palsy, or foot drop, if the cyst is located inferior and laterally. Point-of-care ultrasound confirms the diagnosis with an accuracy of 94%, a sensitivity of 97%, and a specificity of 86% [3]. The ultrasound appearance of the cyst may be multiloculated and contiguous with the knee joint along the meniscus or within the meniscus. The fluid removed from the cyst is often thick and gelatinous and therefore requires a large gauge needle and ultrasound guidance for successful aspiration [4]. A steroid injection is often performed following fluid aspiration. If there is recurrence, the cyst can be surgically removed. CT or MRI can also confirm diagnosis [5]. Point-of-care ultrasound is a useful tool to distinguish meniscal cysts from other cystic and solid masses at the knee joint [6]. The differential diagnosis of meniscal cysts includes osteophytes associated with degenerative joint disease, traumatic bursitis, lipoma, ganglion cyst, or, rarely, synovial sarcoma.

            References

            1) Anderson JJ, Connor GF, Helms CA. New observations on meniscal cysts. Skeletal Radiol. 2010 Dec;39(12):1187-91. doi: 10.1007/s00256-010-0993-2. Epub 2010 Jul 31. PMID: 20680623.

            2)Crowell MS, Westrick RB, Fogarty BT. Cysts of the lateral meniscus. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2013 Jun;8(3):340-8. PMID: 23772349; PMCID: PMC3679639.

            3) Chang A. Imaging-guided treatment of meniscal cysts. HSS J. 2009 Feb;5(1):58-60. doi: 10.1007/s11420-008-9098-z. Epub 2008 Nov 7. PMID: 18989726; PMCID: PMC2642552.

            4) Chen H. Diagnosis and treatment of a lateral meniscal cyst with musculoskeletal ultrasound. Case Rep Orthop. 2015;2015:432187. doi: 10.1155/2015/432187. Epub 2015 Feb 5. PMID: 25722908; PMCID: PMC4334430.

            5) Lantz B, Singer KM. Meniscal cysts. Clin Sports Med. 1990 Jul;9(3):707-25. PMID: 2199079.

            6) Rutten MJ, Collins JM, van Kampen A, Jager GJ. Meniscal cysts: detection with high-resolution sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998 Aug;171(2):491-6. doi: 10.2214/ajr.171.2.9694482. PMID: 9694482.

            This post was written by Skyler Sloane, Ben Supat MD MPH, and Colleen Campbell MD

            Translate »